Iris Printers: The Revolutionary Technology That Transformed Fine Art Reproduction
Share
In the late 1980s, a seismic shift occurred in the art world that would forever change how museums, galleries, and collectors approached reproduction. The introduction of Iris printers marked the beginning of a new era in fine art printing, bridging the gap between traditional photographic processes and digital technology. Developed by Iris Graphics, these large-format inkjet printers were initially designed for commercial proofing in the graphic arts industry, but visionary artists and printmakers quickly recognized their potential for creating museum-quality reproductions. The technology's ability to produce continuous-tone prints with exceptional color fidelity and detail made it the first commercially viable digital printing system capable of meeting the exacting standards of the fine art community.
The Technical Innovation Behind Iris Printing
What set Iris printers apart from other printing technologies of their time was their unique ink delivery system. Unlike conventional inkjet printers that used discrete dots, Iris printers employed a continuous stream of ink that was broken into droplets by ultrasonic vibration. This process, combined with the use of dye-based inks on specially coated papers, allowed for an unprecedented level of tonal gradation and color subtlety. The printers could produce up to 1,800 dpi resolution with a color gamut that rivaled traditional photographic processes. This technical sophistication made Iris prints particularly suitable for reproducing watercolors, pastels, and other media where subtle transitions are crucial to the artistic effect.
The archival qualities of early Iris prints became a subject of both celebration and concern within the art community. While the prints displayed remarkable visual fidelity, questions about lightfastness and longevity prompted important conversations about preservation that would shape subsequent developments in digital printing technology. These discussions ultimately led to improvements in ink formulations and substrate choices, establishing protocols that would benefit later generations of fine art printers.
Iris Prints in the Art Market and Museum World
During the 1990s, Iris prints gained significant traction in both commercial galleries and museum shops. Institutions like the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Museum of Modern Art began using Iris technology to produce high-quality reproductions of works in their collections, making masterpieces accessible to a broader audience. The prints occupied a unique position in the market—they were more affordable than original works yet maintained a level of quality that distinguished them from mass-produced posters. This positioning helped democratize art ownership while maintaining standards that respected both the original artwork and the collector.
Several prominent artists embraced Iris printing as a legitimate artistic medium in its own right. David Hockney created a series of Iris prints in the early 1990s that explored the technology's capacity for vibrant color and texture. Chuck Close produced monumental Iris prints that demonstrated the medium's ability to handle scale while maintaining incredible detail. These artist endorsements helped legitimize Iris printing within the contemporary art world, establishing it as more than just a reproduction technology but as a viable printmaking medium.
The Legacy and Evolution of Iris Technology
While Iris printers are no longer manufactured, their impact on fine art reproduction continues to resonate. The technology pioneered several concepts that became standard in later digital printing systems, including the importance of color management, substrate versatility, and the relationship between resolution and viewing distance. Many of the technicians and artists who worked with Iris printers went on to contribute to the development of subsequent printing technologies, carrying forward the lessons learned during the Iris era.
The most direct descendant of Iris printing is the giclée printing process that revolutionized fine art reproduction. Giclée printing adopted and refined many of the principles first established by Iris technology, particularly in terms of ink formulation, color accuracy, and archival considerations. Where Iris printers used dye-based inks, modern giclée printers typically employ pigment-based inks with significantly improved lightfastness. The substrate options have also expanded dramatically, allowing for printing on everything from traditional papers to canvas and specialty materials.
Collecting and Preserving Iris Prints Today
For collectors, Iris prints represent an important chapter in the history of art reproduction. Early examples from the 1990s are now considered historical artifacts that document a pivotal moment in technological transition. When evaluating Iris prints for acquisition, several factors warrant consideration. Condition is paramount—look for prints that have been stored away from direct light and in stable environmental conditions. Documentation is equally important; well-documented prints with certificates of authenticity and provenance information generally command higher values and provide greater assurance of quality.
The framing and presentation of Iris prints require particular attention. Unlike later giclée prints that often use pigment-based inks, Iris prints employed dye-based inks that can be more susceptible to fading. UV-protective glazing and acid-free matting are essential for preservation. Many conservation framers recommend museum glass or acrylic that filters out ultraviolet light while maintaining optical clarity. Proper framing not only protects the investment but honors the artistic intention behind the print.
Iris Printing's Influence on Contemporary Art Reproduction
The standards established by Iris printing continue to influence how museums and galleries approach reproduction today. The emphasis on color accuracy, detail preservation, and appropriate scaling that characterized Iris output has become foundational to modern reproduction practices. Contemporary art printers working with advanced technologies still reference the Iris era when discussing the evolution of color management and substrate compatibility.
At SantaGood, our approach to art reproduction builds upon this legacy of technological innovation married with artistic sensitivity. While we utilize state-of-the-art printing equipment that surpasses the capabilities of original Iris printers, we maintain the same commitment to color fidelity and detail that made Iris technology revolutionary. Our curatorial team understands that a successful reproduction must honor both the technical achievements of printing technology and the artistic vision of the original work.
Conclusion: The Enduring Significance of Iris Innovation
Iris printers occupy a unique position in art history—not as tools that created original artworks, but as technologies that expanded access to art while raising important questions about reproduction, authenticity, and preservation. Their development represented a crucial bridge between analog and digital reproduction methods, establishing standards that would shape the fine art printing industry for decades. For collectors, historians, and enthusiasts, understanding the Iris story provides valuable context for appreciating both historical prints and contemporary reproductions. The technology's legacy lives on in every high-quality art print that balances technical precision with artistic integrity, reminding us that the reproduction of art is itself an art form worthy of careful consideration and respect.
Frequently Asked Questions About Iris Printers
What made Iris printers different from other printers of their time?
Iris printers used a continuous ink flow system with ultrasonic vibration to create droplets, rather than the discrete dot patterns of conventional inkjet printers. This allowed for smoother tonal transitions and superior color gradation, particularly important for reproducing subtle artistic effects. Their ability to print at very high resolutions (up to 1,800 dpi) on a variety of coated papers made them uniquely suited for fine art applications.
Are Iris prints considered valuable collectibles today?
Yes, particularly early examples from the 1990s that document important artists' exploration of the medium. The value depends on factors including the artist, edition size, condition, and documentation. Well-preserved Iris prints by notable artists who embraced the technology, such as David Hockney or Chuck Close, can command significant prices in the secondary market as historical artifacts of digital printing's emergence in fine art.
How do I preserve and care for an Iris print?
Iris prints require careful preservation due to their dye-based inks. They should be framed using UV-protective glazing (museum glass or acrylic), acid-free mats, and kept away from direct sunlight and high humidity. Ideally, they should be stored in dark, climate-controlled conditions when not displayed. Consulting with a conservation framer experienced with early digital prints is recommended for valuable pieces.
What replaced Iris printers in fine art reproduction?
Iris technology was largely supplanted by giclée printing systems that use pigment-based inks with superior archival properties. While Iris printers established many important standards for color accuracy and detail reproduction, later technologies improved upon ink longevity, substrate versatility, and operational efficiency. Modern fine art printers continue to build upon the foundational principles first implemented in Iris systems.
Can I still get prints made with Iris technology?
Original Iris printers are no longer manufactured, and few operational units exist today. However, the aesthetic qualities that made Iris prints distinctive—particularly their smooth tonal transitions and color richness—can be approximated using modern printing techniques with careful color management and appropriate paper selection. Some specialty printers offer services that emulate the Iris look using contemporary equipment.